.0...3
V. 19.
23rd, october, 1918.
206
-
L
.....
+.
ין
.L
Dear Sir,
Yourself and The China Mail and others.
With reference to .Bowley's letter, while we still
think and Counsel thinks also, that the letter is undoubtedly
a libel and that you ought to succeed in your action, sufficient
time has now elapsed to enable us to gauge the view generally
taken in the Colony. Inasmuch as your success in an action
would depend on the verdict of a jury, it is not unimportant
to pay some attention to that view,
As far as we can discover, we think it very possible
that in spite of any undoubted right of yours to a verdict,
a jury might perversely refuse to give you one, Mr.Potter
shares this view from what he was generally learnt since the
action was instituted.
Under any circumstances if you are given a verdict there
would of course be only a question of nominal damages. The
great point so far as you are concerned in our view and in
youre alto, is to obtain a vindication.
In view of all these circumstances we think you will
be advised to consent to the actions being with drawn upon
an apology being furnished by Mr.Bọ wi@y, @ach si de paying
their om og sts. Buch apology, however, should, in our
opinion and in Mr.Potters, be published in the newspapers
otherwise it would not seem to be of much use to you, You
will remember Mr.Bo wi@y offered to publish it in the
newspapers when conducting the prior nego tiations and we do
not imagine he would stand out against doing so now. we would
recommend, therefore, if we can arrange it and we think it
quite possible that we can do so, that we consent to these
actions being withdrawn upon Mr.Bo wiøy publiming a proper
-1-
Page 210Page 211
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.